Ran out of the previous batch that I made (50g). Findings:
Spreading in hair instead of on brush first works, not sure if it’s more even but it feels like I have more control how much I put where
Putting more on front locks helps with frizz – that’s the part of my hair that gets frizzy e.g. from being wind blown
Still figuring out exactly how much to put where, but in any case my day 3 hair is less frizzy and more curly than my day 1 hair used to be
Putting a little too much in will give a bit of a gel cast feel, it does scrunch out a little bit. I don’t like it on day 1 but it gives great day 2 hair
New batch. Same as before, but with Xanthan gum added to hopefully thicken it more.
6g L-Arginine HCl
69g conditioner
3 drops (~0.2%) essential oil
0.15g (0.2%) Xanthan gum
It didn’t really thicken it up much. Maybe I didn’t use enough, or maybe Xanthan gum doesn’t work very well any more 10 years after its manufacturing date. To be honest the creme was a nice consistency already without it so I don’t think I’ll use it again.
I want to build some sort of cart, or something with wheels to put all my distillation things on so I can easily roll it out of the way. It should permanently hold my big lab stand to hold the biomass vial, and under that I would like it to house a 10L jerrycan and a smaller lab stand to hold the heated mantle and boiling flask. Also, somewhere to put the controller/power for the cooling loop pump. Something like this, with caster wheels under the corners:
I want to make it out of leftover pieces of wood. I would need:
4x 44x44x400mm horizontal
4x 44x44x338mm vertical
2x 69x44x362mm horizontal, at the bottom
2x ~12x150x412mm sides
1x 12x312x450 bottom
1x 12×150+x450 backplate
I can get all of that out of scraps, yay! Let’s get building!
Edit: done! I don’t remember the last time I went from conceptualisation to finishing a project in one afternoon. It’s nice to finish something for a change.
Next up: figuring out all the connections on my random collection of glassware that I want to build a distillation setup from.
I have inherited a 500mL round bottom flask and heating mantle from my lab. I’m trying to see what I would need to make it into an essential oil still.
Option 1a: simple distillation, 250 mL capacity – 29/32
Option 3a: reflux steam distillation, 500-2000 mL capacity – 24/29
This one is the maximum I can do with my 500 mL heating mantle, although I could possibly fit a 2L chromatography flask too. Reduced to 24/29 better to keep 29/32 for easier filling/emptying? Reduce reflux separator and Dimroth condenser?
Wait a minute, I have an awesome big ~1.8L glass reservoir that is the perfect shape! It’s just missing the DN100? lid. The lid on its own is more expensive than all the other options though. Maybe use a temperature resistant funnel? Print a PETG lid and line it with PTFE baking sheet?
Option 3b: as above, but I’ve put more thought into it
Putting a stopcock between the boiling flask and the reservoir is a bad idea. It’ll clog up with plant material. Also, I want the biggest diameter reservoir opening possible, to make it easier to fill/empty/clean.
How on earth am I going to clamp such a tall installation
Do I want to use my jacketed column? Perhaps upside down, but how would I connect the little screw adapter into the 24/29 Clevenger? Maybe just get the cheaper shorter 200 mm Dimroth for €21.27?
Could I perhaps use my condenser as part of a DIY Clevenger? It has an extra port at the bottom. Would need to improvise a stopcock at the spout. This would make for a much less tall setup; it would sit next to the boiling flask / biomass vessel stack, with hydrosol overflow going up diagonally back into the boiling flask or biomass flask. Would need some sort of splitter adapter there, a hydrosol hose, a lid for my reactor (biomass) vessel, possibly an insulated metal pipe from the vessel to the condenser.. Maybe if I want a big volume, I should just hook up the Clevenger & Dimroth to a pressure cooker or other metal pot.
Do I need to put some sort of restriction at the top of the Dimroth condenser to limit flow/vapor loss?
Would a Vigreux column do something? I’m already refluxing
Option 3c
Ok I’ve decided I want the 5mL graduated 24/29 Clevenger and a Dimroth on top of it, but I think I can get away with a shorter 200mm one because of the low heating power and high efficiency of the condenser. I can ramp up the coolant pump if needed, or just add another condenser on top if it turns out to be too short.
Round bottom flask 500 mL dual 29/32 €16.26 single €16.92
Ergo, 200W might just keep up with 500 g / 2 L flask? Otherwise, just run for longer?
Will my 500 mL boiling flask provide enough water for the process?
Fill to max 50%
Water is refluxed
2.8 L/kg -> water must be refluxed at least 6 times
If not enough, just add through condenser? And pre-wet biomass?
Do I want to spend the extra €20 on a flask twice the size?
Do I want to spend €100+ on new glassware when I already have used stuff? It might be toxic and I’d have to figure out connections, especially both sides of the 1.8L reactor that has no lid.. The condenser I could probably figure out now that I know the screw connections. I still want a Clevenger in any case.
I’ve bought a Clevenger (5mL graduated, 24/29 connections).
I’ll try to connect everything I already have up first. But none of those things are made to connect. There are 4 places that I’d like to be mostly “steam tight”:
500 mL round bottom flask to biomass flask: 29/32 ground glass to glass hose connection. Maybe drill out a rubber stopper?
Biomass flask to biomass flask lid: custom clamp? Or maybe make a new lid from stainless steel or old pot lid?
Biomass flask lid to Clevenger: GL25 (or was it GL32?) screw connection to 24/29 ground glass – maybe a 24/29 to hose adapter, and then stick it in a screw cap with teflon ring?
Clevenger to condenser: put the glass hose connection of the condenser into a drilled out 24/29 rubber stopper again?
Lab was throwing out an old drying rack. It’s not in the best shape, but it was free and it’s exactly what I wanted, so I guess I’m not making one myself any time soon. Also, found a spot on the wall.
Another fun project idea: making a DIY overhead stirrer. Something like this but simpler.
I think I already have a suitable 12VDC reduction motor somewhere, and I have spare adjustable DC power supplies (12V 2A and 12V 5A) that I could use to control the speed. I would need a chuck and something to attach the motor to my lab stand. Also, a stirrer attachment.
I can’t find my big gear motors right now, but I do have a cute little 6V 30 rpm one and a 24V 18 rpm one. Plenty of torque, but slow and I think they’re only about 3W continuous.
Ideal would be something like the one in the video, which is the larger ~15W continuous cousin of my mini reduction motors. I guess the 470 rpm one would be nice. I could easily attach a drill chuck to the 8mm shaft using a JT0/B10/B12 connecting adapter, then I don’t have to fabricate anything like the guy in the video did. I think B12 is the right size if I mainly want to use it with 6mm and 8mm stirrer attachments. Either that, or an M10 adapter with an M10 chuck.
I’m going with the M10 option. It has better reviews, it’s not missing the set screws and I like the chuck better.
For attachment, I think I will go with the very simplest option first: just clamp it to the lab stand with a lab clamp straight onto the motor. The motor would be facing sideways but that doesn’t matter. If I like the setup, I might find a better solution. Perhaps a piece of 12mm rod with two hose clamps or something.
I’ve ordered a reduction motor, M10 connector, 1.5-10mm drill chuck and stainless paddle stirrer for €25. That should be everything I need, besides the stand, clamp and adjustable power supply I already have.
As a first test, I added 4 grams of it to 46 grams of store-bought SAPDMA-based conditioner. So about 8% L-Arginine HCl or 6.6% L-Arginine. The change in viscosity was immediate, it got so thick I could barely stir it. I applied it to my hair as I normally do, about 15 grams spread using a wet detangling brush on wet hair, and leaving it in.
Compared to the same conditioner without the Arginine, I feel it works a little worse as a wet detangler because of how thick it is. However, it does seem to work otherwise as intended – my curls appear stronger and more defined, without the gloss that some other products give to my hair. If I add more of the stuff to my hair, it works like hair gel, but less glossy/oily.
I will continue to test it for a few more washes, also see if I can apply it just dissolved in water as a hair mask. I want to understand better what it does before I start formulating with it.
I’ve saved some lab ware and equipment from the dumpster. I wonder if I can use some of it to make a distillation setup for essential oils.
Some things I want to try extracting oil from:
Banana peel
Mandarine peel
Ginger
Cherry tree petals
Rhododendron petals
Monarda didyma
Mentha aquatica
Pine/fir/spruce needles
Green walnut peel
I could start with putting the material straight into my 500mL round bottom flask, which is incidentally the largest still size I can use legally. However it would only fit about 250mL, so adding a biomass chamber with it would be very nice. It would be great if I could somehow use my ~1.8L reactor, it is the perfect shape, however it is missing a lid. I think my jacketed chromatography column could make a decent condenser. However none of them have matching glass fittings..
Thinking of buying a oil/hydrosol separator, or a Clevenger apparatus, to separate and reintroduce the hydrosol to the boiling flask.
Here’s a non-exhaustive list of home lab equipment I own.
Glassware
10L Schott bottle with wide flange (75mm flat ground)
5L Schott bottle (GL45) with bottom side port (GL32)
25cm vacuum desiccator, lid is currently stuck
~1.8L thick-walled reactor with wide flange (100mm flat ground) at the top, spherical joint at the bottom (28/15). No lid, but I do have a hose adapter (18mm?) and clamp to go with the spherical joint
100mL, 500mL and 1000mL volumetric flask (only 100mL one has ground joint & stopper)
250mL (8x), 750mL and 1000mL flat bottom flasks (only 250mL have 29/32 joint, most with stoppers)
500mL round bottom flask with single 29/32 joint, fits my heated mantle
Amber storage bottles in various shapes and sizes. Some beautiful wide mouth ones with octagonal ground glass stoppers that I use for salts (100-2500mL), some narrow mouth ones with screw caps that are more suitable to liquids (250-2500mL).
Chromatography column (?) that is jacketed for 40cm, has a slightly bulbous section on one end with a spout and a GL25 side port, has a GL14 screw connection at the top and two more for the jacket
Various flow meter tubes
Smaller glassware, including reaction tubes and amber dropper bottles
Equipment
200W heated mantle for 500mL round bottom flasks
Various pumps
Analytical balance 0-20g, accurate to a couple mg
Small balance 0-500g, accurate to a couple dozen mg
Other
Glassware drying rack
Beefy lab stand (16mm rod, 1m tall, heavy 45x40cm base)
To solubilise HEC: add slowly to cold water with high shear mixing. To speed up, increase pH first until it hydrolyses, then pH can be adjusted down again.
BTMS-50 too heavy or too greasy in leave-in conditioner? Use Stearamidopropyl dimethylamine (SPDMA) or PEG-100 (emulsifier 165) instead? Panthenol just marketing, makes sticky, ok for leave in conditioner?? Could just use glycerin or proyplene gylcol as humectant, but also stick.
Quats (cationic), e.g. Cetrimonium chloride (detangler), honeyquat, polyquaternium (polyquat, e.g. polyquat-7, polyquat-10), – cationic conditioning ingredients. PQ-7 and 10 should be very low in leave-in product, 0.1%? Cetrimonium chloride is max 0.83% in leave-in products. But: in leave-on products, you don’t need specific cationic polymers. You can use emollients straight away.
Emulsifiers: cationic work best, nonionic ok too, but in leave-in conditioner cationic surfactants not needed. Frizz: can be both from cationic or anionic charge buildup.
Emollients, also for slip: carrier oils, silicones, esters such as C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, coco-caprylate (cyclomethicone replacement), PEG esters
Humectants: glycerin (but sticky at high concentrations), propanediol, sodium lactate,
Go for nonionic surfactants? Coco glucoside, Caprylyl/Capryl Glucoside (only acidic non-ionic surfactant), fatty alcohols like Cetearyl Alcohol and Cetearyl Glucoside, sucrose cocoate (sanfteen, doesn’t work at pH<7), emulsifier 165
I’m looking to formulate a leave-in conditioner for my thin and damaged curly hair. After some searching I have found a product that works for my hair, but it’s a little heavier than I like (it’s not meant as a leave-in) and I would like a little more clumping/hold. It has the following ingredients:
Aqua,
Cetearyl Alcohol,
Stearamidopropyl Dimethylamine,
Glyceryl Stearate SE,
Hydrolyzed Keratin ,
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice,
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract,
Behentrimonium Chloride,
Dipropylene Glycol,
Cetrimonium Chloride,
Glycerin,
(parfum, preservatives, pH adjusters)
I’ve used the above formulation as a starting point but want to change a lot of things. I have the following goals for my formulation:
Wet detangling
Non-greasy / non-wet-look
Provides some clumping/hold
Does not build up on repeated use without shampooing
I want to lower the amount of cationic surfactants, but I can’t source SAPDMA, so I’m using BTMS as a high HLB surfactant. I want to replace Glyceryl Stearate SE with Glyceryl Oleate for its refattening properties, and use Cetearyl alcohol to make up the rest of the low HLB. Then, I want replace all the humectants with a bit of propanediol, and add Coco-Caprylate as an extra emollient. Finally, I would like to use some PVP/VA Copolymer for a bit of clumping/hold. I’ve read that natural gums are harder to use and can cause flaking.
Would these ingredients work well together as a non-greasy leave-in conditioner for curly hair? I am quite new to formulating, so are there any things to look out for, like incompatibilities?
Other film formers: 3.5% – 1.5% hydrolysed silk protein, 1.5% PVP/VA copolymer, 0.5% glyceryl oleate
Emollients: 3% – Coco-caprylate
Oil phase: 4.5%
Formulation:
Heated water phase
88.55% Distilled water
1.5% 1,3-propanediol
Heated oil phase
0.75% Behentrimonium chloride
0.5% Glyceryl oleate
1.5% Cetearyl alcohol
3.0% Coco-caprylate
Cool down phase
1.5% hydrolysed silk protein
1.5% PVP/VA copolymer
0.2% fragrance/essential oils
1.0% Geogard
PVP/VA copolymer gives a wet look which I don’t like. Use less/no humectants (only film forming) to give a dryer look? Some may still be necessary to keep gel hydrated
Idea: LGN using glyceryl oleate (GMO) and Polysorbate 80. This study uses 90mg GMO to 40mg polysorbate 80, for 30% high-HLB by weight. 10-30% is recommended. However, this gives an overall HLB of only ~7.4 which may be too low to emulsify emollients. To get a HLB of 9.3, it would need to be ~45% high-HLB. Calculating by molar percentage, I have to get the molar weights. I asked Perplexity, the answers were wrong but the sources are useful: glyceryl oleate 370.5234 g/mol polysorbate-80 428.60 g/mol. This means the molar ratio in the study is 1:2.6 (high:low), but to get an overall HLB of 9.3, it would need to be 1:1.2. Ratios within 1:1 and 1:6 are mostly LGN, with 1:6 to 1:3 giving high viscosity. Ratios within 6:1 and 1:1 are mixed type emulsions (LGN & micellar system). Additionally, emollients such as ester oils like the coco-caprylate I’d like to use can reduce viscosity.
So: this anionic thickening LGN may be possible, but it may not emulsify coco-caprylate. For it to emulsify, it would no longer be thickening. I would need to add something like cetyl alcohol (242.4 g/mol).
To get to a HLB of 9.5 (ignoring the cetyl alcohol) and a 1:3 ratio high:low, starting from 0.5% glyceryl oleate, I would need the following amounts:
0.50% glyceryl oleate
0.50% polysorbate 80
0.50% cetyl alcohol
Which might not be thick enough because of the coco-caprylate interaction. With BTMS or BTMC instead of polysorbate 80, I would need more cetyl alcohol.
What if I drop the coco-caprylate, so the HLB can be lower?
1.5% Glyceryl oleate (conditioning, refattening)
0.5% BTMC (this brings HLB to ~6, and molar ratio 1:3.3)
5% L-arginine (emollient & simple humectant & fixative) – use 6% if L-arginine HCl
may not emulsify fragrance/EO
May not be thick enough
1% Geogard
acid to pH 4.5-5.0
If using 5% L-arginine (free base)
~3% lactic acid (L-arginine 174.20 g/mol, lactic acid 90.08 g/mol -> about 2:1 molar ratio to neutralise)
~5% citric acid (closer to 1:1 molar ratio)
~1% phosphoric acid (tripolar 98.00 g/mol -> about 5:1 molar ratio to neutralise)
It doesn’t work with glyceryl oleate (GMO) alone, so above formulation needs a thickener or change to BTMC/cetyl alcohol
This study suggests it does work as LGN, but at 25+% surfactant, together with GMS, and even then it is not thickening
GMO together with Polysorbate-80 gives nanoparticles, not really thickening?
GMO:Tween80 ratios ranging 6:1 to 3:1 worked well, 3:1 gave larger particle size
Total surfactant 7-8%
Another study used Ewax (cetearyl alcohol & tween60) & GMO at different ratios; 3:7, 5:5 and 7:3, plus tween80. No info on concentrations or viscosity, but 3:7 Ewax:GMO gave the largest nanoparticle size
Lipid nanoparticles may be too stable. You can dry them and resuspend them, so perhaps they will not disperse in hair?
Conclusion: don’t try to make an LGN with GMO as the LGN promotor. Just use cetyl alcohol. Or use something else to thicken, HEC?
Do I even need GMO? It’s a refatting agent, but I don’t use harsh surfactants. Probably better to use conditioning polymers instead?
Dropping the glyceryl oleate, putting the coco-caprylate back
0.8% BTMC (emulsifier, conditioner)
1.5% Cetyl alcohol (emollient, thickener)
2.0% Coco-caprylate (light oil-like emollient)
6.0% L-arginine HCl (emollient, humectant, provides some hold)
1.0% Geogard
0.2% fragrance/essential oils
acid to pH 4.5-5.0
Process behind the ratios
I looked on specialchem.com and found that Coco-caprylate (or the very similar Coco-caprylate/Caprate) is typically used at 2% in leave-in hair care formulations.
I read into emulsions. The 2% Coco-caprylate that I want to emulsify requires a HLB of 9.3, Cetyl alcohol requires a HLB of 15.5. If I want a total HLB to match with the HLB of BTMC which is 12, I calculated that I need 1.5% Cetyl alcohol.
I want to thicken my conditioner using LGN, so I read into LGNs. If I understand it right, for high viscosity, the molar ratio of surfactant to LGN promotor should be between 1:3 and 1:6 for high viscosity. I calculated that I need about 0.8% BTMC to get to a 1:3 ratio.
I cheched with some light leave-in conditioner formulations I could find if the BTMC and fatty alcohol values are in the right ballpark. Humblebeeandme has 4 light leave-in conditioner formulations, 2 of which use BTMC. The first uses 0.5% BTMC and 1% cetearyl alcohol, but they also use 0.3% cationic guar gum to help stabilise the emulsion and don’t recommend leaving it out. However that formulation has a larger oily fraction (5.5% vs 2.25%), so I might still get away with leaving it out. Also, the L-arginine might help stabilise the emulsion? Their second formulation uses 1% BTMC and 1% cetearyl alcohol, but it doesn’t have to emulsify any oil other than 0.5% fragrance oils. So I think I’m in the right ballpark with 0.8% BTMC and 1.5% Cetyl alcohol.
I read that Arginine at 5-8% has nice fixative properties. I’m starting with 6% L-Arginine HCl which equals about 5% Arginine. I thought about getting the free base instead, but then I’d have to add the acid anyway to get the pH down to 4.5-5. This way I can avoid using strong acids.
Forum post titled “Can Arginine function as a fixative in a leave-in conditioner?”
I want to make a leave-in conditioner for personal use. I want it to be a good wet detangler, provide some clumping/hold for wavy/curly hair without weighing it down too much, and I want it to not build up on repeated use without shampooing. Because of the latter, I’ve settled on trying to formulate a conditioner that mostly works by penetrating hair fibres, instead of creating a film.
I’ve set my eyes on Coco-Caprylate as a lightweight emollient, and I want to try Arginine for its emollient, humectant and supposed fixative properties. For my formulation I took 2% Coco-caprylate as a starting point, calculated that I need 1.5% Cetyl alcohol to get the HLB to 12 (same as BTMC), then calculated that I need about 0.8% BTMC to get to a 1:3 molar surfactant to fatty alcohol ratio for high viscosity LGN. I hope I understand the emulsifier & LGN theory right and this will create a nice consistency, perhaps with a little experimentation.
0.8% BTMC
1.5% Cetyl alcohol
2.0% Coco-caprylate
6.0% L-arginine HCl
1.0% Geogard
0.2% fragrance/essential oils
pH to 4.5-5.0
My questions:
Am I using Arginine correctly in this formulation? I could only find the recommendation by @vitalys on this forum that it has “excellent fixative properties” and “5-8% will already bring nice fixation, especially in hair sprays”. I did find formulations using Arginine but they were all <0.5%.
How can an amino acid like Arginine have fixate properties? Does it polymerise, or maybe remodel disulfide bonds? Is it an interaction with other molecules taking advantage of Arginine’s affinity for hair protein and its cationic charge at pH<9?
Will this formulation work well for what I want, or does “fixative” for instance necessarily mean that it won’t be a good wet detangler?
Thanks for any help!
Feedback: BTMC to 1% active, ratio to 1:4, maybe more emollients
Dyeing polyester is a chore. Maybe I can just paint them instead, using acrylic paint.
I could make my own fabric medium (for thinning down acrylic paint) using glycerin, vinegar and water. I have some old glycerin that I wanted to throw out anyway.
This video looks very similar to what I want to try. They came out a bit blotchy but I think that’s a cool look, if I didn’t want that I could wet the fabric beforehand to make the paint stick more evenly.
Would need a hot iron to completely cure the acrylic onto the fibres. Or perhaps an oven, or a blow dryer.
I want to dye my curtains. When I moved into my current place I really needed curtains and I bought the first ones I could find that were cheap, “blackout” and at least somewhat close to the colour palette I wanted for my room. But they turned out to be “greige”, while I wanted beige. Now I have them I think I’d like them better in a shade of brown.
For some reason, I have a complete extra set of these curtains, so I shouldn’t be afraid to experiment. Also, I don’t mind if it turns out a bit more “rustic”; the colour doesn’t have to be perfectly consistent. Finally, it doesn’t have to be the most permanent dye, because I rarely (if ever) wash my curtains.
Of course, I don’t want to make things easy for myself and just buy fabric dye. I want to see if I can make my own.
I’m thinking of walnut husks, or iron oxide. I don’t necessarily want to go for natural dyes, but they seem the most accessible and I want to dye it my curtains a natural colour.
I’m doing some research and it looks like polyester is typically dyed in pressurised machines at 130°C to swell the fibre and open it up for dye penetration. It is possible to dye at lower temperature, but the compounds needed to swell the fibres at a lower temperature are generally toxic (benzoic acid, dichlorobenzene) and even though I could probably source them, I don’t think it’s environmentally responsible to use those. In general, polyester fibres are hydrophobic and will not absorb water-soluble dyes.
Alkaline treatment can help make the fibres hydrophilic, although this comes at the cost of some fabric weight loss.
Apparently somebody found that the bark of a tropical tree can be used on polyester, in combination with a copper sulfate mordant it would give the colour I want.
One study looked into madder as a natural dye for polyester, at different temperatures and using different mordants, and found that at 100°C the mordants performed no better than without, however copper sulfate seemed to perform similarly to using no mordant at 60°C. It gives a bit of an orangy-beige colour. Apparently potassium sulfate can work as a mordant too and I could experiment with magnesium sulfate too.
Continuing reading, I’m starting to realise that this would be a logistically challenging project. Even the commercial fabric dyes would need close to 100°C to work, and I don’t think we have a pot big enough to fit even just 1 of the curtains on our stove. I might be able to borrow a vat that I could dump them in together with boiling water, but I probably won’t be able to get it over 60°C. Maybe I can throw a heating element in.
One study found that vanillin can be used as a sustainable carrier for low-temperature polyester dying. The results are promising! It’s not as good at colouring as the carcinogenic ones, but, well, it’s not carcinogenic. (Para-)vanillin is easy to get and relatively cheap in low quantities and improves the K/S value (I guess this is the maximum colour uptake value?) from 2 to 3.5 compared to using no carrier. Ortho-vanillin could get to 7.5, but I can’t source it.
Other essential oils (Cinnamaldehyde, Thymol, Geraniol) may function similarly. Acetone may solve as a co-solvent?
One study used iron sulfate and fatty acids to colour polyester at boiling temperature.
This study managed to dye (green) using ethanol extracted chlorophyll from sweet potato leaves at 60-80°C. They used metal ion mordants and found that copper sulfate works best, at a very low pH around 3. I really like the idea of dyeing with leaf matter, and I think green curtains would work well as well.
I would need:
A vat with a heating element and a thermometer
A bunch of green leaves, they dried at 50°C
Ethanol to extract chlorophyll – they used 100g dried leaves per 1L 60% ethanol
A pot to boil the leaves – they extracted for 100 minutes at 90°C
Copper sulfate
An acid
Still, metal ions aren’t great to dispose of in the sewage system and it’s still a lot of hassle.
I’ve decided I want to try this formulation with some substitutions.
I found an old tin of moustache wax with only 3 ingredients; beeswax, lanolin and sandalwood oil. I think it’s 50-70% beeswax, 20-40% lanolin, and up to 10% sandalwood oil. I think I will remelt some of that and use it as the beeswax and heavy oil part of the formulation.
6g BTMS-50
8g remelted moustache wax
4-5.6g beeswax
1.6-3.2g lanolin
<0.8g sandalwood oil
5g mango butter
8g light to medium oil – grapeseed, argan, almond
2 drops vitamin E oil
10 drops of essential oil (fir, rosemary, ..?)
Update: I melted down some of the moustache wax with olive oil in the microwave as a simple test. I found out that even with a much lower fraction of beeswax, I really don’t like this type of moustache/beard balm. It’s not a very strong hold, but it is sticky enough that I really don’t want it on my hands.
If I’m going to do a moustache/beard balm, it has to be water soluble.
Soluble calcium in the formulation reacts with fluoride to give insoluble calcium fluoride, making it less effective unless you don’t rinse and drink anything for several hours after
If I want the best fluoride action, I should get soluble sodium fluoride, and I should not use calcium compounds as the abrasive. This is why the toothpaste tablets I buy from the store have cellulose and silicate instead of calcium carbonate, I think.
I could spend €20 to get 100 grams of sodium fluoride which would last me a lifetime, but I’d prefer to not have so much of a toxic compound in a drawer so I’m continuing to look for smaller quantities.
Cellulose (microcrystalline cellulose, MCC, E460): this is also less abrasive than most other most other toothpaste binders. I can’t find a good source for buying it yet.
Calcium carbonate – makes fluoride less effective (Mohs 3.0)
Sodium bicarbonate – more of a filler, not abrasive enough on its own (Mohs 2.5)
Magnesium carbonate – also makes fluoride less effective, but magnesium fluoride is slightly more soluble (Mohs 4.0-4.5)
Dehydrated silica gels – too hard/abrasive (Mohs 7 vs enamel’s 5)
Silicates – too hard/abrasive
Hydrated aluminium oxides – I don’t want aluminium, also way too hard (Mohs 9)
Phosphate salts
Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD, Mohs 3.5) – fluoride interaction? It is compatible with monofluorophosphate (MFP). Can find as animal feed and bulking supplement, but this is typically the much harder anhydrous form (DCPA), so I would need to hydrate it. That’s ok, I need to add water to make a slurry anyway. Calculate how much DCPA is needed, calculate how much water is needed to hydrate 100%, calculate how much extra water is needed for formulation, soak overnight, filter and dry back to required weight. May not have same properties as commercial DCPD, which I was able to find here (food grade)
insoluble sodium metaphosphate (IMP)
sodium hexametaphosphate. Edit: sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) is not used as abrasive, but as a soluble active ingredient that helps prevent staining and tartar – best used around 0.25% because then it also prevents tooth erosion, with possible negative effects.
Natural materials: cedar nut shell powder, walnut shell powder, olive stone powder, almond shell powder, pistachio shell powder, pear stone powder, etc. all have a Mohs hardness around 3.5 – ideal hardness for a mild tooth abrasive. However, may be hard to find in the right size (<100µm, possibly smaller needed), may contain pigments that stain, may require rinsing after brushing
Thickening agents
Mineral colloids, e.g. clay
Seaweed colloids e.g. carrageenan
Natural gums
Cellulose gum; Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)
Hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC)?
Xanthan gum
Synthetic cellulose
Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)?
Other stuff:
Xylitol – active ingredient, sweetener. 25% is ideal
Fluoride: I want sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP)
Zinc (zinc chloride 47.98%, zinc citrate 22.77%, zinc acetate 35.64%, zinc gluconate 13.29%): inhibits plaque formation, prevents halitosis. Allowed up to 1%, although there was a proposal to lower this to 0.1% for toothpaste but in this study 1% was deemed to be perfectly safe. I’m finding it difficult to find any food safe soluble zinc powder as a consumer though. Perhaps zinc oxide (80.35%, Mohs 4.5) works ok? Colgate uses it. However, not very soluble.
I’ve decided that calcium carbonate base would still be the easiest, even if it makes the fluoride less effective. Many toothpaste products still combine these two.
Total formulation:
50% calcium carbonate – 500 g makes 2.0 kg for €6.88
20% sodium bicarbonate – 454 g makes 2.3 kg for €1.70
With each tablet being about 0.3 to 0.5 g, this set of ingredients would make me about 3000 tablets for €48.44 (€0.016 each), compared to about €0.042 each at the store. Including the €5.99 silicone mould the break even point for 1 person is about 2 years worth of toothpaste tablets (~1500).
The surfactants I only need very little of, and I’m already buying them for other products, so I guess the total cost for this project is a little lower. The zinc oxide and sodium fluoride I will have way too much of, but the calcium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and xylitol are easy to get more of so if I really wanted to I could make 20,000 tablets for around €100 (€0.005 each) which would last me about 27 years.
I ordered some items that I hope to be able to use as moulds.
The first is a pet treat baking mould that I hope to use for making toothpaste tablets. It’s made out of food-grade silicone and has 468 “hemispheres” of 12mm diameter. They’re not entirely pill-shaped so I hope it works! I looked up toothpaste tablet sizes and apparently they range from about 8mm to about 12mm so I guess it should be about the right size.
The second item is a pair of Onigiri rice ball presses that I hope to use for making shampoo bars. Again I don’t know if it’ll work, but apparently some people have had success with them. The shampoo bars I buy from the store are 6cm diameter, 3cm thickness, 65g, but I wouldn’t mind them to be a bit bigger. The rice ball press is about 7.5×9.5cm so a little bigger but I think it would still be a nice size.
I just found out that I have some rancid old stuff in a box. I want to see if I can reuse it for something where that doesn’t matter so much.
I have this rancid stuff:
250 mL shea butter, bought 4 years ago
250 mL shea butter, bought 8 months ago
500 mL coconut oil, bought who knows how long ago
“Jojoba oil” (mostly grape, then jojoba, some vit E and also sunflower), bought I don’t know how long ago
150 mL glycerine, bought I don’t know how long ago
I can’t find any uses for the rancid glycerol, I’ll probably just throw it out. I guess it could burn in a diesel stove or perhaps mixed with ethanol in a small burner, although it would produce a lot of particulates and I haven’t got any of those anyway.
The newer shea butter smells slightly vinegary, but the others are most definitely very rancid. I think it would be fun to see if I can reuse at least some of them for something.
One way to reuse rancid butter & oil for soap is to do a brine wash, to salt out the non-saponifiables. There’s a good guide in this thread. Nice video here.
I have an idea to make liquid dish soap from the shea butter and jojoba. Something like the liquid laundry detergent I also want to make, but with 10% soap added. For the soap I could use this calculator to see how much lye I need; since I don’t want superfat and I will brine wash anyway I think I can use an excess of lye.
10% soap
1.1% lye
8.9% shea butter
15% SLS
5% Coco betaine
3% Coco glucoside
Citron essential oil
pH adjustment to about 9
No idea if this recipe would actually work. It would cost about €2.50 per liter in ingredients which is slightly higher than store-bought washing up liquid. So.. I might as well just try to dissolve the soap in store bought washing up liquid?
Some more research: apparently this would make it a “combo” soap, although that might refer to anhydrous products. These products apparently contain 10-50% mild syndet (surfactant based soap) next to the regular soap. Syndet bars (e.g. shampoo bars) can be around 80% surfactant, so soap:surfactant ratio is roughly anywhere between 10:1 and 1:1.
On the other hand, traditional soap is known to leave film on dishes and on the sink, and regular washing up liquid works just fine, so there is no reason to actually do this other than to use something that I should throw away. Also, rancid oil can cause people to develop annoying sensitivity to specific oils.
Maybe I should just do that and throw all this stuff out.
Update 3 weeks later: I’ve discarded everything rancid in the “used oils” waste disposal bin. I’m proud of myself
I want to buy some ingredients, so I’m making an overview of what I want and what I have. I went through a box of old stuff and found some ingredients, most of which are rancid..
Have
Shea butter, rancid
Coco butter, a little rancid
“Jojoba oil” (mostly grape, then jojoba, some vit E and also sunflower), also rancid
Glycerine 150mL, possibly rancid?
Aloe vera gel 92%, still smells ok
Essential oils:
Tea tree 40mL
Rosemary 40mL
Citron 30mL
Lavender 10mL
Various powdered chemicals, e.g. NaOH and fertiliser ingredients
Want
Assuming 100g toothpaste tablets, 200g shampoo bar, 500 mL conditioner, 500 mL lube, 1 L wool wash, 100g deodorant, 50g beard balm
150g Sodium cocoyl isethianate (SCI) – for shampoo bar, wool wash
108g Coco betaine – for shampoo bar, detergents
30g Coco glucoside – for detergents
14.5g BTMS-50 – for beard balm & conditioner & shampoo bar
6g BTMS-50 – also helps against build up (could replace with BTMS-25)
2-4g beeswax
5g mango butter – could replace with shea but greasier
12g oils (could be replaced with grapeseed, sunflower?)
Vitamin E
And an even lighter conditioning formulation (6% beeswax):
3g BTMS-25
0.9g beeswax
3g coconut oil
8g oils (jojoba, argan, ..)
Vitamin E
Also, this guide is great for checking the effect of different percentages of beeswax. Basically:
50%: hard & sticky, doesn’t melt
33%: firm & not really sticky, melts slowly
25%: soft & not sticky, melts averagely
20%: not solid, melts averagely
17%: not solid, melts quickly
13%: not solid, melts very quickly
BTMS and any butters also affect the consistency. BTMS-25 is a more potent hardener than BTMS-50. The butters from soft to hard: coconut, mango, shea, cacao – this matters less at >10% wax. Of these, mango is the least greasy. Only coconut melts directly on skin contact, the others need some convincing.
I think I’d like to try the BTMS-50 & mango butter one, perhaps substituting coconut oil instaead.
This recipe with zinc ricinoleate & zinc – hard to get
Alcohol based: isopropanol? Might not be good for skin
Try to recreate my current deodorant based on Triethyl citrate (TEC) – probably about3-5%. Replace propylene glycol with glycerin like this product? Or this one? Formulations on Specialchem (or at least the ones without alcohol) have about 3% glycerin.
Some ingredients:
Glycerin
Triethyl citrate (TEC)
Xanthan gum? HEC?
Isopropanol?
pH buffer
I did find TEC (29%) in a product called dermosoft decalect deo MB, which also contains sodium caproyl/lauroyl lactylate (70%) and sage oil (1%). Specifically meant for deo. Maybe I’ll just buy that. At the recommended concentration of 0.5% however that’s only like 0.15% TEC though. Hm.
I want to make my own soap-free laundry detergents; one for wool wash and one for general laundry. The general one should use aggressive surfactants, the wool one must obviously be mild. I haven’t made any detergent before.
I’m starting off my research here at thethingswe’llmake, where they use liquid SLS, coco betaine, and decyl glucoside as surfactants, salt as a thickener, and preservatives. This looks like a great recipe for cotton and synthetics, but the SLS is too harsh for wool.
Wool is in some ways similar to human hair, and on hiking trips I’ve used my (CG) shampoo bar for washing my wool clothes. I think if ingredients are not CG, they are probably not good in a wool wash detergent too. Handwashing with mild shampoo seems to be considered safe.
Wool wash detergents typically contain:
Surfactants such as SCS, lauryl glucoside, and cocamidopropyl betaine – similar to some shampoos.
Emollients like lanolin (wool fat). Typically 0-1%, or 5-7.5% in lanolin replenishing formulations. However lanolin is probably not what I want, it’ll prevent moisture wicking of the garments.
pH adjusters such as citric acid – pH should be neutral to acidic (pH<4 can help preserve)
I guess I could just adjust the thethingswe’llmake formulation to use a milder anionic surfactant:
5% SCI – poorly soluble so mix with coco betaine first (melt the surfactant phase?)
5% Coco betaine
3% Coco glucoside
2% table salt
pH adjustment to pH 5-7 is ideal for wool, pH <5.5 is ideal for Geoguard, pH >6.0 is best for SCI because otherwise it will start to hydrolyse. Maybe another surfactant or preservative? Aim for pH 5.5-6.0 otherwise
I’m quite happy with my shampoo bar. However, it’s only available from 1 shop and they’ve been known to change their formulation.
The current formulation uses the following ingredients: SODIUM COCOYL ISETHIONATE, AQUA (WATER), GLYCERIN, COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE DODECANOIC ACIDS, PARFUM (FRAGRANCE), OLEA EUROPAEA (OLIVE) FRUIT OIL, SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS (JOJOBA) SEED OIL, PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS (SWEET ALMOND) OIL, PERSEA GRATISSIMA (AVOCADO) OIL, CHONDRUS CRISPUS EXTRACT, URTICA DIOICA (NETTLE) EXTRACT, RUBUS IDAEUS (RASPBERRY) FRUIT EXTRACT.
The formulation clearly uses SCI in noodle/needle form to give the soap bar some texture, which really works well to get the soap into my hair so I want to replicate this. I’ll have to look up how to make a formulation without melting the SCI.
A similar recipe using SCI and Cocamidopropyl betaine can be found here although they use SCI powder. Also they add BTMS-25 which is what I already was going to get for my conditioner. Humblebeeandme also has a recipe including BTMS. Wait, this is what I was looking for! Humblebeeandme figured out how to leave the noodles intact. They use SCI/SCS/glycerin/oil instead of SCI/coco beatine/glycerin oil, and probably quite a bit less glycerin, but it’s close enough. The idea is that they use just enough water to dissolve the surfactants together but not enough to dissolve them completely. Alternatively, the secondary phase can be melted separately and mixed with the cold surfactants to melt them together but not melt them completely.
The 3 formulations I could find use about 90% surfactants, 2-4% humectant/binder, 4-6% oil.
Surfactants
Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate (SCI) noodles
Cocamidopropyl betaine
BTMS-25
Humectants / binders
Glycerin – in original formulation probably used to keep the bar from cracking
Hydrolyzed protein – but I don’t want protein
Agar
Carrageenan
Oils
I’d like to use some lighter oils than the Kruidvat bar:
Sunflower oil
Almond oil
Argan oil
Formulation
Taking the savvyhomemade formulation and the humblebeeandme one as inspiration, this is the formulation I would like to try: